Each generation has its visionaries - those with the gift of prophesy who
may be doomed to mockery and disbelief. Such was not quite the fate of Rachel
Carson, although she suffered her share of dismissive sexism, and is perhaps
not known and honoured enough within the ranks of new-generation environmentalists.
Linda Lear’s timely and definitive biography will certainly introduce
a new readership to the magnificent achievement of Silent Spring - the work
that did more than any previous book (and maybe even since) to waken and alarm
the world to the permanent damage done when shortsighted and rapacious humanity
deliberately pollutes the planet.
Born in Springfield, Mass. in 1907, Rachel Carson learned at her mother’s
knee a love of landscape and all its inhabitants, however tiny, that transcended
mere enjoyment. They shared a Wordsworthian sense of nature as a moral force,
before which there is no choice but to learn and be humble. Carson’s
early world was to be ruined by industrial pollution which nevertheless brought
much-needed jobs, and although the memoryof the smokestacks and ugliness would
remain with her forever she was always aware that passion must needs be tempered
by a degree of pragmatism.
Her first ambitions were literary, and all through her life she would craft
sentences with an ear finely attuned to the poetry of language, even within
scientific discourse. But a beloved and gifted science teacher at Pennsylvania
College for Women was to change her life. By 1928 Carson was planning a career
in science, and her early obervation of nature had broadened into ecological
consciousness.
Rachel Carson’s efforts to become a marine biologist at a time when female
scientists were not welcome within the academic community, and subsequent success
as a government scientist in the Fish and Wildlife Service, are fascinating
in themselves, but the real drive of Lear’s narrative is in Carson’s
development of insights and ideas that were before their time. In 1936, for
example, she wrote a densely researched article which concluded that the decline
in numbers of a certain fish was ‘probably the result of destructive
methods of fishing, the pollution of waters by industrial and civic wastes...’ She
warned that if the shad were to survive, ‘regulations must be imposed
which consider the welfare of the fish as well as that of the fisherman’.
Her life’s work, which was to illuminate the effects of human intrusion
on nature whilst doing everything possible to instil a respect for its intricate
processes, had begun.
By 1945, chief breadwinner for a complicated and difficult family yet longing
to leave the government service, Carson knew that her future must lie in science
writing for the lay audience, a means by which she could also express her inner
vision. A moving passage from her first book, Under The Sea Wind (1941) Carson
shows the lyrical influence of Richard Jefferies:
‘To stand at the edge
of the sea, to sense the ebb and flow of the tides, to feel the breath of a
mist moving over a great salt marsh, to watch the flight of shore birds that
have swept up and down the surf lines of the continents for untold thousands
of years, to see the running of old shad and young eels to the sea, is to have
knowledge of things that are as nearly eternal
as any earthly life can be’.
The runaway bestseller success of The Sea Around Us in 1951 testified to a
craving in the American public (beset by growing fear of the arms race) for
a larger dimension within which spirit and science could meet. Carson herself
denied that her preoccupations were in any way escapist or unrealistic, pointing
out that, ‘the mysteries of living things, and the birth and death of
continents and seas, are among the great realities’. In public and in
private she toiled to make people understand the interdependence between the
physical environment and the life it sustains.
By the fifties Rachel Carson was already aware of the terrifyingly irresponsible
use of DDT, which was being sprayed on fields and trees as part of the so-called ‘war
on insects’, with no knowledge of its long-term effects. She became involved
with the ‘Great Cranberry Scandal’ of 1959, when the bushes were
drenched with a herbicide that turned out to be a carcinogen, and yet as Thanksgiving
approached suspect fruits were shipped to market, whilst politicians ate handfuls
in public to prove they were quite safe..... Sounds vaguely familiar? The depressing
thing about reading Lear’s excellent biography is the knowledge that
nothing much has changed. Rachel Carson was in the front line of a battle which
is still going on today, between those who regard mankind as humble custodians
of the earth, and the rapacious ones who think only of today’s returns.
When Silent Spring was published in 1962, Carson was already being consumed
by the cancer that would end her life at the age of 57. The Velsicol Corporation,
a huge pesticide manufacturer, tried to stop publication of her book. Not so
long afterwards they polluted the entire Mississippi. Then the Monsanto Corporation,
an industry leader in the development and manufacture of pesticides, responded
to Silent Spring by distributing a mocking parody of Carson’s warnings
to every newspaper in the USA. This same Monsanto is currently at the heart
of the controversy over genetically-modified soya. You have only to glance
at the pages of Farmers Weekly to realise that the ‘war against insects’ goes
on, with indiscriminate napalm and slash tactics - which is why UK pesticides
were worth £1.3 billion in 1994.
In Britain and American, then as now, the land is in thrall to the all-powerful
agri-business (and its political apologists) which capitalises on avarice and
ineptitude. Were she alive today, Rachel Carson would find much to make her
rage, as well as weep. Two years ago, for example, Graham Harvey published
The Killing of the Countryside (a book Carson would have been proud
of) and described poisoned ditches, vanishing meadows, and fields stripped
of flowers, butterflies, animals and birds. Silent Spring indeed.